Quick video messages instead of meetings
Loom lets you record quick screen + face videos instead of scheduling meetings. Insanely useful for async teams. Started bootstrapped on maxed credit cards, grew to 10M+ users, sold to Atlassian for $975M in 2023. The free tier is still generous enough for most solo use. Business costs $18 per user per month and removes the video and length limits, and Business + AI costs $24 with AI editing; paying annually saves up to 17%.
Best for Solo founders who explain work to clients or customers with short recorded screen videos instead of calls.
Plans
| Plan | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $0 | 25 videos per person, 5-minute recordings, up to 720p |
| Business | $18/mo | Per user; unlimited videos and recording time, up to 4K |
| Business + AI | $24/mo | Per user; adds AI titles, summaries, chapters and filler word removal |
Prices checked on the vendor's page
Pros
- Record screen + face video and share a link in under 60 seconds
- Free tier gives you 25 videos up to 5 minutes each
- Replaces meetings that should have been an email (or a video)
Cons
- Owned by Atlassian since 2023. Some features are being gated to paid plans
- Videos longer than 5 minutes or more than 25 videos require Business ($18/user/month)
Compare
- Airtable vs Loom
- Basecamp vs Loom
- Cal.com vs Loom
- Calendly vs Loom
- Canny vs Loom
- DocSend vs Loom
- Fathom vs Loom
- Gamma vs Loom
- Google Workspace vs Loom
- Granola vs Loom
- Linear vs Loom
- Loom vs Noko
- Loom vs Notion
- Loom vs Otter.ai
- Loom vs Pitch
- Loom vs SavvyCal
- Superhuman Docs vs Loom
- Loom vs Tally
- Loom vs Toggl Track
- Loom vs Tuple
- Loom vs Whereby
Verified