Sourcegraph's AI coding assistant, sold only with Sourcegraph Enterprise since the Free and Pro plans ended in July 2025
Cody’s strength is Sourcegraph’s code graph. While most AI tools see only the files you have open, Cody can draw on an index of your whole repository, so it can answer questions like “where is the authentication logic?” even when those files are closed.
Sourcegraph stopped new Cody Free and Pro sign-ups on 25 June 2025 and ended both plans on 23 July 2025. Cody is now available only on Sourcegraph Enterprise, which starts at a $16,000 yearly contract, and Sourcegraph pointed individual users to Amp, its separate coding agent. For a solo founder, GitHub Copilot is the closest low-cost editor assistant, Cursor gives whole-codebase context in a full editor, and Claude Code works across a repository from the terminal.
Best for Engineering organisations with large codebases; there is no plan for a one-person company.
Plans
| Plan | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | From $16K/yr | Minimum annual contract, AI credits included, single-tenant cloud |
Prices checked on the vendor's page
Pros
- Uses Sourcegraph's code search to answer questions across large codebases
- Works in VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio (experimental), the Sourcegraph web app and a CLI
- Sourcegraph says it does not use customer data to train models
Cons
- No plan for individuals: Cody Free and Cody Pro ended on 23 July 2025
- Sourcegraph Enterprise requires a yearly contract starting at $16,000
- Built for engineering organizations, not solo founders
Compare
- Aider vs Cody
- Base44 vs Cody
- Bolt.new vs Cody
- Claude Code vs Cody
- Cline vs Cody
- Cody vs Continue
- Cody vs Cursor
- Cody vs Devin
- Cody vs Devin Desktop
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Google Antigravity
- Cody vs Lovable
- Cody vs OpenAI Codex
- Cody vs Pieces for Developers
- Cody vs Replit Agent
- Cody vs Supermaven
- Cody vs Tempo
- Cody vs Trae
- Cody vs v0
- Windsurf Plugin (formerly Codeium) vs Cody
Verified