Cody vs GitHub Copilot
Pricing
Cody: Enterprise only, from $16,000 a year
GitHub Copilot: Free tier, Pro from $10/mo
Description
Cody: Sourcegraph's AI coding assistant, sold only with Sourcegraph Enterprise since the Free and Pro plans ended in July 2025
GitHub Copilot: GitHub's AI coding assistant: inline suggestions, chat, and agent mode right in your editor
Pros
- Uses Sourcegraph's code search to answer questions across large codebases
- Works in VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio (experimental), the Sourcegraph web app and a CLI
- Sourcegraph says it does not use customer data to train models
- Works everywhere: VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, Xcode, even the CLI
- Free tier is enough to see if AI coding helps your workflow
- $10/mo Pro is the cheapest paid option from a major player
Cons
- No plan for individuals: Cody Free and Cody Pro ended on 23 July 2025
- Sourcegraph Enterprise requires a yearly contract starting at $16,000
- Built for engineering organizations, not solo founders
- Suggestions can be generic, less context-aware than Cursor or Cody
- Agent mode is newer and still catching up to Cursor and Cline
- Free tier limits you to 2,000 completions/month
Details
Cody’s strength is Sourcegraph’s code graph. While most AI tools see only the files you have open, Cody can draw on an index of your whole repository, so it can answer questions like “where is the authentication logic?” even when those files are closed.
Sourcegraph stopped new Cody Free and Pro sign-ups on 25 June 2025 and ended both plans on 23 July 2025. Cody is now available only on Sourcegraph Enterprise, which starts at a $16,000 yearly contract, and Sourcegraph pointed individual users to Amp, its separate coding agent. For a solo founder, GitHub Copilot is the closest low-cost editor assistant, Cursor gives whole-codebase context in a full editor, and Claude Code works across a repository from the terminal.
Copilot is the safe default. It works in almost every editor, the price is right, and if you already use GitHub for your repos, it plugs in without any extra setup. The inline suggestions are good for everyday coding: writing boilerplate, completing function signatures, filling in repetitive patterns.
Where it falls short compared to newer tools is deep project understanding. Cursor and Cline can reason about your entire codebase; Copilot’s context window is more limited. The newer agent mode is improving this, but it is still playing catch-up. If you just want solid autocomplete at a low price, Copilot is hard to beat. If you want an AI that can refactor across 20 files, look elsewhere.
Cody verified
GitHub Copilot verified
