⚙️ Automation Comparison

Make vs n8n

A detailed comparison to help you choose the right tool for your needs.

Last updated: 2026-02-05

Make

Free tier, paid from $9/mo

Strengths

  • + More complex workflows possible
  • + Visual builder is intuitive
  • + Better pricing than Zapier

Weaknesses

  • Steeper learning curve
  • Owned by Celonis now
Visit Make →

n8n

Self-host free, cloud from $20/mo

Strengths

  • + Self-hostable
  • + More powerful than Zapier/Make
  • + 70k+ GitHub stars

Weaknesses

  • Steeper learning curve
  • Self-hosting needs technical skill
Visit n8n →

The verdict

Which one is right for you?

Choose Make if you want

  • More complex workflows possible
  • Visual builder is intuitive

Choose n8n if you want

  • Self-hostable
  • More powerful than Zapier/Make

In depth

About each tool

Make

Visual automation that's more powerful than Zapier

Make (formerly Integromat) is automation for people who outgrow Zapier. The visual workflow builder lets you do branching, loops, error handling — stuff that’s painful elsewhere. Founded in Czechia by Ondřej Gazda, bootstrapped to 250k+ customers before being acquired by Celonis for $100M+.

n8n

Open source workflow automation

n8n is automation for people who want control. Founded by Jan Oberhauser in 2019, it’s “fair-code” — source is open, you can self-host free, but can’t commercialize it. 70k GitHub stars. Quadrupled revenue in 8 months after pivoting to AI automation. Europe’s 25th fastest-growing startup in 2024.

Stay ahead of the curve

Get weekly picks of the best tools for solo founders, plus tips on building with AI.

Join solo founders getting weekly tool recommendations. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Keep exploring

Related comparisons

Still deciding?

Explore more Automation tools

Browse the full category or discover tools across all categories.