Lovable vs Tempo
Pricing
Lovable: Free tier, Starter from $20/mo
Tempo: Free tier, Pro from $20/mo
Description
Lovable: Describe your app idea, get a working React + Supabase app you can actually edit and deploy
Tempo: AI React app builder with a visual editor: import Figma designs or describe what you want
Pros
- Generates full-stack apps (React frontend + Supabase backend) from a description
- Built-in Supabase integration handles auth, database, and storage
- Non-technical founders can build real, functional products
- Visual drag-and-drop editing alongside AI generation
- Import Figma designs and turn them into working React components
- Outputs clean React + Tailwind code you can take with you
Cons
- You get what the AI decides: limited control over code architecture and patterns
- Complex business logic still needs a developer to implement properly
- Tied to React + Supabase stack whether that is the right choice or not
- React-only: if you use Vue, Svelte, or anything else, this is not for you
- Visual editor hits limits fast when building complex application logic
- Newer tool with a smaller community and fewer resources
Details
Lovable (formerly GPT Engineer) is for founders who have an idea and want a working app, not a wireframe or a mockup. You describe what you want, and it generates a full-stack React app with a Supabase backend: auth, database, the works. You can then edit the code or keep iterating with prompts.
This is not a toy. People have shipped real MVPs with it. But know the limits: the generated code follows patterns the AI knows, which may not be the best patterns for your specific use case. If your app is a straightforward CRUD tool or marketplace, Lovable can get you 80% there. If you need complex real-time features or unusual architecture, you will hit walls.
Tempo sits between a design tool and a code generator. You can import Figma designs, use AI prompts, or visually edit components with drag-and-drop, then export clean React and Tailwind code. It is the visual approach to AI-assisted coding.
If you think in terms of visual layouts rather than code, Tempo might click better than text-prompt tools like v0. The Figma import is particularly useful if you already have designs. The limitation is that it only outputs React, and the visual editor works better for UI than for business logic. Think of it as a UI building tool, not a full app builder.
Verified
